ASP.NET - Server.Transfer v/s Server.Execute

home
asp.net
view story

13 Kicks

Kick It

Drop Kick

Kicked

ASP.NET - Server.Transfer v/s Server.Execute(techahead.wordpress.com)

submitted by prashantvictory(605) 4 years, 3 months ago

Difference between Server.Transfer and Server.Execute.

3 comments |category: ASP.NET |Views: 83
Tweet

tags: Server.Execute TechAhead ASP.NET Server.Transfer another

Everyones tags:

Your Tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

More who kicked this story...

Comments:

posted by senfo(881) 4 years, 3 months ago 0

I have yet to have a valid use for Server.Execute(), so if anybody has any good examples, I'm all ears.

posted by ussherm(5285) 4 years, 3 months ago 0

I still want to know why you wouldn't just use a Redirect. It seem to me that leaving the original URL in the browser via a Server.Transfer could be a huge PITA and have many un-intended consequences... like what happens if the user refreshes the page?

posted by simoneb(5450) 4 years, 3 months ago 0

DotNetKicks uses it in the Global.asax file, to handle error pages, you might want to check it out. About what happens when the user refreshes the page, nothing weird, the url in the address bar is requested again and the logic of the page begins from scratch, reissueing eventual Transfers or Executes.

Most Active Users

What's this?