Crazy talk: Inline scripting and code-behind

home
asp.net
view story

34 Kicks

Kick It

Drop Kick

Kicked

Crazy talk: Inline scripting and code-behind(blog.wekeroad.com)

submitted by jongalloway(4350) 4 years, 3 months ago

Rob Conery says it's time to reconsider inline script in ASP.NET.

2 comments |category: ASP.NET |Views: 13
Tweet

tags: RobConery ASP.NET another

Everyones tags:

Your Tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

djProduct(50) -

smason(5) -

ColinCochrane(235) -

wwb_99(870)

More who kicked this story...

Comments:

posted by gavinjoyce(25.7k) 4 years, 3 months ago 0

Great post.

I was one of the many caught in the server control/viewstate headlights when asp.net first arrived. I always kept business logic out of the UI but the control/page events and databinding usually led to a mass of code split between the aspx page and code behind.

Working with Rails for over a year has changed my opinion on inline scripting in the UI. Simple views are simply better. Roll on the ASP.NET MVC.

posted by simoneb(5450) 4 years, 3 months ago 0

Hmm, don't want to sound rude, but let's try not to be silly, there's not much to be proud of in discovering that code inlining at times is much better than the control model. It just stays to mean that we didn't do any progress at all compared to jsp and php with respect to presentation logic. Or worse, we thought we did and we're just realizing that it was not true.

Most Active Users

What's this?