LINQ Equivalent of SQL's "IN" keyword

home
c#
view story

3 Kicks

LINQ Equivalent of SQL's "IN" keyword (www.ginktage.com)

submitted by isenthil(2304) 9 months, 14 days ago

LINQ Equivalent of SQL’s “IN” keyword I came across the requirement to use the “IN” equivalent of LINQ when using Entity Framework . I am sure most of the .NET Developers would also have come across a situation to use “IN” in LINQ . Here’s an example .

2 comments |category: C# |Views: 35
Tweet

tags: C# another

Everyones tags:

Your Tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

bsenoff(1583) -

dpeterson(4397) -

isenthil(2304)

Comments:

posted by dpeterson(4397) 9 months, 14 days ago 0

Very nice, I feel that's actually a pretty nice translation from the SQL equivalent.

posted by vijayst(1311) 9 months, 14 days ago 0

Interesting. Will it work with similar names. Assume the table contains "Gautham", and upcoming array contains "Gautham Menon". Will upcoming.Contains(m.Name) correctly leave alone Gautham.

Most Active Users

What's this?