StringBuilder is not always faster

home
c#
view story

26 Kicks

StringBuilder is not always faster - Part 2(chinhdo.com)

submitted by chinhdo(395) 4 years, 4 months ago

n a previous article (”StringBuilder is not always faster), I provided some quick benchmark data and gave “rules of thumb” for when to use StringBuilder and when to use traditional string concatenations. In this follow-up article, I will attempt to provide a more detailed analysis.

3 comments |category: C# |Views: 9
Tweet

tags: StringBuilder C# another

Everyones tags:

Your Tags:

Please login or signup.

Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

"Kick It" text
"Kick It" background
kick count text
kick count background
border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.

Users who kicked this story:

Zero3(0) -

armencz(220) -

ashithmr(90) -

rocjoe71(0)

More who kicked this story...

Comments:

posted by jamesewelch(2275) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

Nice follow up

posted by Aaronontheweb(1140) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

I actually factored the concerns and benchmarks you posted into my Facebook application since I was a bit concerned about concatenation operations presenting a scalability problem. Thanks for the great post!

posted by chinhdo(395) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

Aaron: Great! Glad I could help :-)

Most Active Users

What's this?