Microsoft go for MONO ? What's the truth behind .NET source release ?(evain.net)

submitted by marcosmarcos(2779) 4 years, 4 months ago

Lets look something further to the announce of M$ to release the source code of the .NET framework. In a possible future they can said that some of the MONO contributors is using them variable name convention, or that MONO copy a loop from the implementation of WPF. Is a smart trick from MS or you think that they become open ?

7 comments |category: |Views: 8

tags: another

new Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

  • "Kick It" text
  • "Kick It" background
  • kick count text
  • kick count background
  • border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.


Users who kicked this story:
Comments:

posted by yesthatmcgurkyesthatmcgurk(4063) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

Wow, this is fucking stupid. Can I anti-kick?

Reply

posted by marcosmarcos(2779) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

LoL

Did you read the page:

"If you have looked at Microsoft’s implementation of .NET or their shared source code, you will not be able to contribute to Mono. "

How do you think that an OpenSource project can exist without contributors ?

Best Regards

Reply

posted by yesthatmcgurkyesthatmcgurk(4063) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

ಠ_ಠ <( Everything is a conspiracy. )

Reply

posted by yesthatmcgurkyesthatmcgurk(4063) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

DAMN YOU, SMILEYS!!!:D=);):):,(:(;(

Reply

posted by jamesewelchjamesewelch(2275) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

Truth is

1) "it's a cool thing to do" and
2) "we'll get lots of buzz if we do this" and
3) "everyone that will ever use this can already see the code using reflection so it won't hurt anything"

Reply

posted by cdjacocdjaco(5) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

-1 for use of "M$" in a description. Let your audience reach their own conclusions without biasing them.

Reply

posted by marcosmarcos(2779) 4 years, 4 months ago 0

I'm glad to hear that =)

I just post that story because was the first thing to come to my mind after what ups with TestDriven.Net and the way with MS sue anyone, and thinking in the Balmer words about Linux that breaks all patents, or thinking in the office ribbon.

Maybe I'm a bit paranoid, but MS don't help me to be other way until today, so, maybe I will keep thinking in the counterpart.

BTW I agree that is a very very cool thing !! we stepping in into .NET frameworks is simply AWESOME !! and maybe some bugs in the framework can be fixed faster with this.

Miguel de Icasa has good words for it too and expose some other reasons for that

http://tirania.org/blog/archive/2007/Oct-03.html

Best Regards

Reply

information Login or create an account to comment on this story