Custom logic in C# automatic properties(blog.somecreativity.com)

submitted by dnksid(355) 3 years, 3 months ago

The article tries to make an argument in favor of having support for introducing custom-logic with automatic properties in C#. It also shows a possible solution and asks for ideas for refinement. read more...

add a comment |category: C# |Views: 71

tags: C#3 .net3.5 Lambda C# AutomaticProperties another

Being more productive with C# 3(blogs.msdn.com)

submitted by johnman(1280) 4 years, 4 months ago

A blog posting by Somasegar talking about some of the useful features of the C# 3.0 language. C# 3.0 comes with the .Net 3.5 Framework (not .Net 3.0...that has C# 2.0......I know.......hopefully .Net 4 will have C# 4 in it and we can move on from the confusion created by the release of .NET 3 - which is .Net 2.0 + Cardspace, WPF, WCF and WF). read more...

add a comment |category: C# |Views: 0

tags: AutomaticProperties TypeInference C# ExtensionMethods another

C# 3.0: The Sweet and Sour of Syntactic Sugar(rapidapplicationdevelopment.blogspot.com)

submitted by Lear(1195) 4 years, 9 months ago

C# 3.0 brings three new syntactic sugar features: Automatic Properties, Object Initializers, and Collection Initializers. This post discusses why too many convenience features can ruin the language. read more...

2 comments |category: C# |Views: 10

tags: ObjectInitializers CollectionInitializers AutomaticProperties C# C#3.0 another

Automatic Properties C# 3 Reploaded(thinkersroom.com)

submitted by Gandalf(465) 4 years, 11 months ago

Automatic properties are around the corner and will soon be amongst us. It's about time! Though they could have been some interesting alternative implementations .... read more...

2 comments |category: C# |Views: 1

tags: AutomaticProperties Rad C# another

C# Automatic Properties: Semantic changes to help cope with poor synta(aabs.wordpress.com)

submitted by aabs(850) 5 years ago

Proposed changes to the C# language seem set to break backward compatibility, and confuse developers. Was it all to patch holes in the original language design, or just to save a few extra keystrokes? Refactoring tools can save us from the misery of those extra keystrokes, so why bother with this change to the language? read more...

add a comment |category: C# |Views: 4

tags: AutomaticProperties C# another