<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with TypeMock</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'TypeMock' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testing Entity Framework Video</title>
      <description>Video on examples for unit testing EF apps. Entity framework has been considered hard to test, This video shows how to do it easily with Typemock Isolator. You can download the presentation and code and try it for yourselves. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsite.typemock.com%2fdatabase-page%2f2009%2f12%2f22%2funit-testing-entity-framework-video.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsite.typemock.com%2fdatabase-page%2f2009%2f12%2f22%2funit-testing-entity-framework-video.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_Entity_Framework_Video</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Unit_Testing_Entity_Framework_Video</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:33:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introducing Entity Framework Unit Testing with TypeMock Isolator</title>
      <description>One of the challenging things with current version of Entity Framework, its leakage of testability. Which means when you build an application or module (e.g. Repositories) that depends on entity framework, it will be very hard to unit test your code isolated from Entity Framework. This might lead to conduct Integration Testing which will require a connection and interaction with underlying data store (database).

You might think of using Mocking to mock or fake Entity Framework data store dependent calls. But sadly Moq and Rhino Mock mocking frameworks do not support this. And you'll end up hitting the wall. Both frameworks are great useful and I personally use Moq for a while now and very happy with it. But no one can deny limitations when exist. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmosesofegypt.net%2fpost%2fIntroducing-Entity-Framework-Unit-Testing-with-TypeMock-Isolator.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmosesofegypt.net%2fpost%2fIntroducing-Entity-Framework-Unit-Testing-with-TypeMock-Isolator.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Introducing_Entity_Framework_Unit_Testing_with_TypeMock_Isolator</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Introducing_Entity_Framework_Unit_Testing_with_TypeMock_Isolator</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 19:07:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Integrating TypeMock with ASP .NET Unit tests</title>
      <description>Ivonna let's you write ASP .NET Unit tests in conjunction with TypeMock &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnizarnoorani.com%2findex.php%2farchives%2f111"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnizarnoorani.com%2findex.php%2farchives%2f111" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Integrating_TypeMock_with_ASP_NET_Unit_tests</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Integrating_TypeMock_with_ASP_NET_Unit_tests</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 01:31:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy, test and pack your code - Part 2 Using MsBuild</title>
      <description>In part one of this packing series I have shown, how you can automate your build process, test and optionally mock by using the popular .net deployment tool NAnt. If you don't know what I am talking about and just landed here by help of search engine. Let me put the link below again.

http://weblogs.asp.net/mehfuzh/archive/2008/08/30/deploy-test-and-pack-your-code-part-1-using-nant.aspx

In this post, I will do a replay to mostly what I have talked in my last post but with MsBuild.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f07%2fdeploy-test-and-pack-your-code-part-2-using-msbuild.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f09%2f07%2fdeploy-test-and-pack-your-code-part-2-using-msbuild.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Deploy_test_and_pack_your_code_Part_2_Using_MsBuild</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Deploy_test_and_pack_your_code_Part_2_Using_MsBuild</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Deploy, test and pack your code - Part 1 Using NAnt</title>
      <description> this part, I show a way to build and deploy your project using NAnt. As, you already might know that NAnt is a tiny deployment tool that enables you to create a deployment package with some  *.build files which contains nothing but few XML directives.
... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f30%2fdeploy-test-and-pack-your-code-part-1-using-nant.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f30%2fdeploy-test-and-pack-your-code-part-1-using-nant.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Deploy_test_and_pack_your_code_Part_1_Using_NAnt</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Deploy_test_and_pack_your_code_Part_1_Using_NAnt</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:19:37 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mock HTTP layer to do complex tasks like uploading photo to Flickr</title>
      <description>In this post, I will show how you can use Typemock to fake out complex HTTP POST like uploading photo in Flickr server. The example which will be shown here, gives a pretty much generic idea of faking out HTTP calls and gain access to the response stream for comparing result with original content.I have used, N-Unit along with Typemock which is run thorough TMockRunner.exe to perform the mock test. ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f06%2fmock-http-layer-to-do-complex-tasks-like-uploading-photo-to-flickr.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f05%2f06%2fmock-http-layer-to-do-complex-tasks-like-uploading-photo-to-flickr.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Mock_HTTP_layer_to_do_complex_tasks_like_uploading_photo_to_Flickr</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Mock_HTTP_layer_to_do_complex_tasks_like_uploading_photo_to_Flickr</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 13:56:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mocking static methods with Typemock</title>
      <description>There are mocking tools like Rhino Mock, Moq, NMock, Typemock and many more. Recently, I was kinda evaluating mocking tools to mock out REST calls in Linq.Flickr. Almost all of the mock tools requires some sort of interface reference to work on. When, to mock out methods like XElement.Load or File.Open is impossible with most of the tools, Typemock is one step ahead of others as it supports mocking of static methods... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f04%2f21%2fmocking-static-methods-with-typemock.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fmehfuzh%2farchive%2f2008%2f04%2f21%2fmocking-static-methods-with-typemock.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_static_methods_with_Typemock</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Mocking_static_methods_with_Typemock</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 03:39:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TDD/Using Mock objects with CSLA.Net</title>
      <description>Implementation of the Unit Testing on CSLA v2.1 using TypeMock dynamic mocking library. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nermins.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2cd9a9fa9c-a700-4157-9c5e-59119bf0ea08.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.nermins.net%2fPermaLink%2cguid%2cd9a9fa9c-a700-4157-9c5e-59119bf0ea08.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Using_Mock_objects_with_CSLA_Net</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/TDD_Using_Mock_objects_with_CSLA_Net</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 May 2007 11:46:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
