<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com - Stories tagged with WebForms</title>
    <description>the latest stories tagged with 'WebForms' from DotNetKicks.com</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>URL Routing with ASP.NET 4 Web Forms  (VS 2010 and .NET 4.0 Series) </title>
      <description>URL routing was a capability we first introduced with ASP.NET 3.5 SP1, and which is already used within ASP.NET MVC applications to expose clean, SEO-friendly "web 2.0" URLs.  URL routing lets you configure an application to accept request URLs that do not map to physical files. Instead, you can use routing to define URLs that are semantically meaningful to users and that can help with search-engine optimization (SEO). With ASP.NET 4.0, URLs like above can now be mapped to both ASP.NET MVC Controller classes, as well as ASP.NET Web Forms based pages. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f13%2furl-routing-with-asp-net-4-web-forms-vs-2010-and-net-4-0-series.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fscottgu%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f13%2furl-routing-with-asp-net-4-web-forms-vs-2010-and-net-4-0-series.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/URL_Routing_with_ASP_NET_4_Web_Forms_VS_2010_and_NET_4_0_Series</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/URL_Routing_with_ASP_NET_4_Web_Forms_VS_2010_and_NET_4_0_Series</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 01:41:59 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>xVal with WebForms</title>
      <description>I finally found some time last night to see what it would take to get xVal working in an ASP.NET Web Application Project.  After a few hours I had something. I only needed to add two classes on top of xVal, DataAnnotationsValidationRunner and ModelValidator. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjohn.rummell.info%2fjohn%2fblog%2fpost%2fxVal-with-WebForms.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjohn.rummell.info%2fjohn%2fblog%2fpost%2fxVal-with-WebForms.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/xVal_with_WebForms</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/xVal_with_WebForms</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 15:09:33 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC: An Application Platform</title>
      <description>When deciding on your ASP.NET development platform I recently read a recommendation that boiled down to: application? WebForms. Web site? MVC. MVC isn't just for creating SEO/RESTful web sites. It's a full fledged application platform with everything you need.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevelopmentalmadness.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2faspnet-mvc-application-platform.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevelopmentalmadness.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2faspnet-mvc-application-platform.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_An_Application_Platform</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_An_Application_Platform</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 16:32:09 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>You should NOT use ASP.NET MVC if. . . </title>
      <description>Jeffrey Palermo shares his opionions when you should NOT use ASP.NET MVC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fyou-should-not-use-asp.net-mvc-if%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffreypalermo.com%2fblog%2fyou-should-not-use-asp.net-mvc-if%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/You_should_NOT_use_ASP_NET_MVC_if</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/You_should_NOT_use_ASP_NET_MVC_if</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:12:42 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>TipJar: Title Tags and Master Pages</title>
      <description>There are a couple of peculiarities worth understanding when dealing with title tags and master pages within Web Forms and ASP.NET MVC. These assume you are using the HtmlHead control, aka &amp;lt;head runat=&amp;quot;server&amp;quot; /&amp;gt;. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f03%2ftipjar-title-tags-and-master-pages.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f03%2ftipjar-title-tags-and-master-pages.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/TipJar_Title_Tags_and_Master_Pages</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/TipJar_Title_Tags_and_Master_Pages</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 01:21:54 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ASP.NET Architecture</title>
      <description>Keyvan has written a nice post about the new architecture of ASP.NET web applications by describing how Microsoft is dividing ASP.NET to ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Dynamic Data. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnayyeri.net%2fblog%2fnew-asp-net-architecture%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnayyeri.net%2fblog%2fnew-asp-net-architecture%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/New_ASP_NET_Architecture</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/New_ASP_NET_Architecture</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:35:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>New ASP.NET Architecture</title>
      <description>Keyvan has written a nice post about the new architecture of ASP.NET web applications by describing how Microsoft is dividing ASP.NET to ASP.NET WebForms, ASP.NET MVC and ASP.NET Dynamic Data. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnayyeri.net%2fblog%2fnew-asp-net-architecture%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnayyeri.net%2fblog%2fnew-asp-net-architecture%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/New_ASP_NET_Architecture</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/New_ASP_NET_Architecture</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2009 00:35:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>A better, easier way to make sure you've globalized everything</title>
      <description>A better, easier way to make sure you've globalized everything in your application &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.milkcarton.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f02%2f10%2fA%2bBetter%2bEasier%2bWay%2bTo%2bMake%2bSure%2bYouve%2bGlobalized%2bEverything.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.milkcarton.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f02%2f10%2fA%2bBetter%2bEasier%2bWay%2bTo%2bMake%2bSure%2bYouve%2bGlobalized%2bEverything.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/A_better_easier_way_to_make_sure_you_ve_globalized_everything</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/A_better_easier_way_to_make_sure_you_ve_globalized_everything</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:46:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>10 Reasons ASP.NET Webforms (Still) Rock</title>
      <description>With ASP.NET MVC being the new hotness, some just can't resist the urge to proclaim that, all of a sudden, Webforms Suck. Well, some of us have been making a living on Webforms for years, and despite proclamations to the contrary, Webforms are still useful and are here to stay. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2f10-reasons-asp-net-webforms-still-rock%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2f10-reasons-asp-net-webforms-still-rock%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/10_Reasons_ASP_NET_Webforms_Still_Rock</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/10_Reasons_ASP_NET_Webforms_Still_Rock</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2009 01:54:23 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>http://codeclimber.net.nz/archive/2008/12/30/looking-at-oxite-the-ldqu</title>
      <description>Simone Chiaretta shares his opinions about Oxite, the CMS built by MIX team as a showcase for ASP.NET MVC, and talks how the downsides of the software can help you apply your knowldege in ASP.NET WebForms in ASP.NET MVC. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f30%2flooking-at-oxite-the-ldquoglass-half-fullrdquo-way.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodeclimber.net.nz%2farchive%2f2008%2f12%2f30%2flooking-at-oxite-the-ldquoglass-half-fullrdquo-way.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/http_codeclimber_net_nz_archive_2008_12_30_looking_at_oxite_the_ldqu</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/http_codeclimber_net_nz_archive_2008_12_30_looking_at_oxite_the_ldqu</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 20:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.net MVC Vs ASP.net Web Form</title>
      <description>Software Architects have been involving lot of debates about the approaches and architectures. Some of the examples are ORM Vs Store Procedures, REST Vs SOAP, etc. There is a debate happening inside the Microsoft community about ASP.net web form Vs ASP.net MVC. Many people thinking that ASP.net MVC will be replace webforms at least eventually and others are thinking that ASP.net MVC will not be replace webforms. Will ASP.net MVC replace webforms?. ASP.net MVC is an alternative approach to webforms rather than a replacement. It will not replace webforms and webforms will not replace ASP.NET MVC. The fact is that ASP.NET MVC and webforms will co-exist and that ASP.NET MVC is not a replacement for webforms. If you prefer ASP.net MVC use it and you feel webform is more comfortable, you can use it. . Both approaches are just choices and different approaches and choices are good things. Different choices are available for other platforms especially in the Java platform. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fshijuvarghese%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f09%2fasp-net-mvc-vs-asp-net-web-form.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fweblogs.asp.net%2fshijuvarghese%2farchive%2f2008%2f07%2f09%2fasp-net-mvc-vs-asp-net-web-form.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_net_MVC_Vs_ASP_net_Web_Form</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/ASP_net_MVC_Vs_ASP_net_Web_Form</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 19:36:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>jQuery Goodness and ASP.NET AJAX - Take II</title>
      <description>So clearly I am obsessing about getting jQuery features into my WebForm applications.  I would seriously love to see the following added ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.dzone.com%2fnews%2fjquery-goodness-and-aspnet-aja"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.dzone.com%2fnews%2fjquery-goodness-and-aspnet-aja" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/jQuery_Goodness_and_ASP_NET_AJAX_Take_II</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/jQuery_Goodness_and_ASP_NET_AJAX_Take_II</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 15:38:21 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to easily insert row in GridView with SqlDataSource?</title>
      <description>Asp.Net 2.0 GridView control is very powerful control. Developers at Microsoft really did a great job when designing it.
Its like Swiss Army knife for selecting, editing, sorting, paging and displaying data.
Combined with various DataSource controls (ObjectDataSource, SqlDataSource) it helps you execute most of your Read, Update and Delete operations without writing a single line of code.
Off course, nothing is perfect. For example, creating new data is is one common task that is not so simple to accomplish with GridView.
Let see how we can easily insert new rows of data using GridView and SqlDataSource... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aspdotnetfaq.com%2fFaq%2fHow-to-insert-row-in-GridView-with-SqlDataSource.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aspdotnetfaq.com%2fFaq%2fHow-to-insert-row-in-GridView-with-SqlDataSource.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_easily_insert_row_in_GridView_with_SqlDataSource</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_easily_insert_row_in_GridView_with_SqlDataSource</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 15:33:30 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to do Cross Page Postbacks in Asp.Net 2.0 - Tutorial with examples</title>
      <description>Back in the days of ASP.NET 1.x there was no easy way to make post-backs to pages different than the current page (so called Cross Page Postbacks).
From Asp.Net 2.0 this is solved with built-in features that allow  us to easily send information from one page to another.
Lets see how... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aspdotnetfaq.com%2fFaq%2fHow-to-make-Cross-Page-Postback-in-ASP-Net.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.aspdotnetfaq.com%2fFaq%2fHow-to-make-Cross-Page-Postback-in-ASP-Net.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_do_Cross_Page_Postbacks_in_Asp_Net_2_0_Tutorial_with_examples</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/How_to_do_Cross_Page_Postbacks_in_Asp_Net_2_0_Tutorial_with_examples</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 22:31:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>What's Ailing ASP.NET Web Forms</title>
      <description>Rick Strahl summarises the disadvantages of the current ASP.NET WebForms model, and how the new ASP.NET MVC framework might address some of these issues. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f198731.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.west-wind.com%2fweblog%2fposts%2f198731.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/What_s_Ailing_ASP_NET_Web_Forms</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/What_s_Ailing_ASP_NET_Web_Forms</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Dec 2007 01:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dynamically adding controls to ASPX pages (web forms) and assigning ev</title>
      <description>Although I've seen a lot of articles describing how to dynamically add controls to a Web Form, few mention even a little hint to how you can make event handlers actually WORK with dynamically-added controls. This article may seem (and probably is) a beginner-level one, but I think it's essential to cover this issue. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetzone.gr%2fcs%2fblogs%2fsfilip%2farchive%2f2007%2f11%2f08%2fdynamically-adding-controls-and-assigning-event-handlers-to-web-forms-aspx-pages.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetzone.gr%2fcs%2fblogs%2fsfilip%2farchive%2f2007%2f11%2f08%2fdynamically-adding-controls-and-assigning-event-handlers-to-web-forms-aspx-pages.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Dynamically_adding_controls_to_ASPX_pages_web_forms_and_assigning_ev</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Dynamically_adding_controls_to_ASPX_pages_web_forms_and_assigning_ev</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:00:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>MVC in WebForms:The impossible fight to get rid of views centric world</title>
      <description>Ayende talks about three common approaches for implementing the MVC pattern while still trying to use WebForms (and all of the controls that come with it), and how they each fail in one aspect or another. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f01%2fMVC-in-WebForms-The-impossible-fight-to-get-rid-of.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fayende.com%2fBlog%2farchive%2f2007%2f06%2f01%2fMVC-in-WebForms-The-impossible-fight-to-get-rid-of.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/MVC_in_WebForms_The_impossible_fight_to_get_rid_of_views_centric_world</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/MVC_in_WebForms_The_impossible_fight_to_get_rid_of_views_centric_world</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jun 2007 07:16:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
