5 Kicks

Response.Redirect and Server.Transfer Demystified(adamtibi.net)

submitted by adamtibiadamtibi(905) 3 years, 6 months ago

Detailed comparison between ASP.NET's Response.Redirect and Server.Transfer

1 comment |category: |Views: 19

tags: another

new Add a live kick counter to your blog >> liveImage

You can even customize the image by choosing your own colors, and then clicking the button below to update the preview and the html code:

  • "Kick It" text
  • "Kick It" background
  • kick count text
  • kick count background
  • border

Simply copy and paste this HTML into your blog post.


Users who kicked this story:
JimMcleanJimMclean(0) - senfosenfo(881) - StefanPienaarStefanPienaar(20) - mdoppmdopp(856)
More who kicked this story...
Comments:

posted by senfosenfo(881) 3 years, 6 months ago 0

I've always felt that one of the inherent design problems with a traditional ASP.NET web page is that it forces forms to be submitted via POST rather than easily allowing submission via GET. Outside of ASP.NET, there are cases where neither a Response.Redirect() nor a Server.Transfer() would be recommended. For example, it's not uncommon to build a search page, which displays search criteria in the address bar. Unfortunately, the only way I know of to replicate the functionality of a GET is to manually build query string parameters and then append them to the end of the page that I'd like to Response.Redirect() to. The extra overhead is unnecessary as browsers and web servers already have this functionality built in.

Reply

information Login or create an account to comment on this story
Submit a Story
View upcoming stories
How else can I help?
Add our feeds to your site

Most Active Users

What's this?