Using Gallio with NCover(blog.andreloker.de)

submitted by aloker(1810) 3 years, 2 months ago

The transition from MbUnit 2.4 to MbUnit 3/Gallio is not as easy as one might expect. This article describes how Gallio can be used with NCover in manual or automatic builds. read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 310

tags: Testing another

Beginning Mocking With Moq 3 - Part 3(codethinked.com)

submitted by simonech(10.1k) 3 years, 2 months ago

Beginners introduction to mocking using the recently released Moq 3 framework. This is part 3 of the series read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 158

tags: Testing another

Beginning Mocking With Moq 3 - Part 2(codethinked.com)

submitted by justin_etheredge(8539) 3 years, 2 months ago

Beginners introduction to mocking using the recently released Moq 3 framework. read more...

1 comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 234

tags: check CodeThinked Moq Service Testing another

Beginning Mocking With Moq 3 – Part 1(codethinked.com)

submitted by justin_etheredge(8539) 3 years, 2 months ago

A intro to mocking using the newly release Moq 3 framework. read more...

4 comments |category: Unit Testing |Views: 451

tags: CodeThinked Moq Testing xUnit another

Why should I use mocking objects in my Unit Test?(blog.decayingcode.com)

submitted by arch4ngel(585) 3 years, 3 months ago

If we cut out any "fanboy" or favouritism toward certain framework and that we try to keep it in a one liner... I would say: "To simulate behaviours of objects that are impractical or impossible to incorporate inside a unit test". The Wikipedia's article about Mock Object mention some reason an object should be mocked. read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 178

tags: mocking methodology Testing another

100% Unit Testable Linq To Sql Repository - Kazi Manzur Rashid's Blog(weblogs.asp.net)

submitted by jantu(1045) 3 years, 3 months ago

In this post, I will show you how you can architect your Linq To Sql repository which will have 100% code coverage. I will use our favorite Northwind database along with my ongoing UnityCommonServiceLocatorMVC project. First, lets add a Linq To Sql diagram in our project and drag n drop the Category and Product table that will look something like foll... read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 372

tags: To Unit Code Coverage mock another

Integrating TypeMock with ASP .NET Unit tests(nizarnoorani.com)

submitted by noorani786(342) 3 years, 3 months ago

Ivonna let's you write ASP .NET Unit tests in conjunction with TypeMock read more...

3 comments |category: Unit Testing |Views: 168

tags: TypeMock ivonna asp .Net Testing another

Building a Nant Script -- Part 2: Adding NUnit tests(dimecasts.net)

submitted by dwhittaker(13.1k) 3 years, 3 months ago

Taking a look at how to create a build script with Nant, learning how to add NUnit tests read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 195

tags: NUnit Dimecasts.net NAnt Testing another

Saving the World via… TDD?(stevenharman.net)

submitted by ussherm(5285) 3 years, 4 months ago

A quick snippet of code showing the gist of the Context/Specification pattern... and ensuring we won't need John Connor's help after all. read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 397

tags: Testing another

Verifying code and testing with Pex(blog.maartenballiauw.be)

submitted by maartenba(5845) 3 years, 4 months ago

Earlier this week, Katrien posted an update on the list of Belgian TechDays 2009 speakers. This post featured a summary on all sessions, of which one was titled “Pex – Automated White Box Testing for .NET”. Here’s the abstract: “Pex is an automated white box testing tool for .NET. Pex systematically tries to cover every reachable branch in a program by monitoring execution traces, and using a constraint solver to produce new test cases with different behavior. Pex can be applied to any existing .NET assembly without any pre-existing test suite. Pex will try to find counterexamples for all assertion statements in the code. Pex can be guided by hand-written parameterized unit tests, which are API usage scenarios with assertions. The result of the analysis is a test suite which can be persisted as unit tests in source code. The generated unit tests integrate with Visual Studio Team Test as well as other test frameworks. By construction, Pex produces small unit test suites with high code and assertion coverage, and reported failures always come with a test case that reproduces the issue. At Microsoft, this technique has proven highly effective in testing even an extremely well-tested component.” After reading the second sentence in this abstract, I was thinking: “SWEET! Let’s try!”. So here goes… read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 249

tags: Pex Testing another

Design and Testability(codebetter.com)

submitted by JanVanRyswyck(2724) 3 years, 5 months ago

Another good one read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 347

tags: Testing another

Genesis: Bridging The Gap Between Requirements And Code(davybrion.com)

submitted by teranex(60) 3 years, 5 months ago

About the Genesis methodology and toolkit for software developers, that links unit tests to requirements in the functional analysis document... read more...

add a comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 285

tags: Testing another

Testing is hard but debugging just sucks A$$(devlicio.us)

submitted by Jemm(9604) 3 years, 6 months ago

"At the users group I asked the question to the group 'who creates automated tests as part of their daily development cycle?'. After I asked this question I followed it up with, and if you don't WHY, WHY, WHY, WHY...... Below are some of the answers I received (btw, not the first time I have heard these reasons)." read more...

1 comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 366

tags: Testing another

Is Code Coverage Really All That Useful?(kevinwilliampang.com)

submitted by kpanghmc(2055) 3 years, 6 months ago

Test driven development proponents often tend to push code coverage as a useful metric for gauging how well tested an application is. 100% code coverage has long been the ultimate goal of testing fanatics. But is code coverage really all that useful? If I told you that my application has 100% code coverage, should that mean anything to you? read more...

1 comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 252

tags: yes Testing another

My Year With TDD(brian.genisio.org)

submitted by BrianGenisio(1000) 3 years, 7 months ago

It's been over a year now since I have been developing using TDD (Test Driven Development) as my primary development practice. I wanted to reflect on what it has done for me professionally. In reality, the past year has been great for my professional career in many ways. read more...

1 comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 525

tags: Testing another

Insidious Dependencies(stevesmithblog.com)

submitted by ssmith(1160) 3 years, 7 months ago

Many dependencies in code are obvious, such as relying on a particular framework or database implementation. Others can easily be overlooked. This article exposes some of the more insidious dependencies that commonly exist within applications which may be overlooked as such. read more...

1 comment |category: Unit Testing |Views: 310

tags: IoC Testing another