<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by Davbis93</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by Davbis93</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Slash your ASP.NET compile/load time without any hard work</title>
      <description>Tips &amp;amp; tricks to make your ASP.NET development more enjoyable (cut down compilation time / first load time). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.lavablast.com%2fpost%2f2010%2f12%2f01%2fSlash-your-ASPNET-compileload-time.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.lavablast.com%2fpost%2f2010%2f12%2f01%2fSlash-your-ASPNET-compileload-time.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Slash_your_ASP_NET_compile_load_time_without_any_hard_work</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Slash_your_ASP_NET_compile_load_time_without_any_hard_work</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Dec 2010 14:41:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Selective Unit Testing - Costs and Benefits</title>
      <description>Test Driven Development is widely regarded as a hallmark technique of professional software development, but should you really do it all the time? Steve Sanderson argues that unit tests yield significant practical business value only for certain kinds of code. This blog post suggests what might be the underlying forces that determine whether unit tests will justify the long-term expense of creating and maintaining them. These ideas are then applied to structuring an ASP.NET MVC application. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.codeville.net%2f2009%2f11%2f04%2fselective-unit-testing-costs-and-benefits%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.codeville.net%2f2009%2f11%2f04%2fselective-unit-testing-costs-and-benefits%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Selective_Unit_Testing_Costs_and_Benefits</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Selective_Unit_Testing_Costs_and_Benefits</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NHibernate and Execution Plans</title>
      <description>Lately we have been investigating ORM's (Object Relational Mapping) frameworks for use on a large enterprise level website which we been given the rare opportunity to rebuild from the ground up in Microsoft MVC. We decided to go ahead with NHibernate until stumbled across a major issue causing queries run by NHibernate not re-using SQL Server execution plans. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fNHibernate-and-Execution-Plans.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fNHibernate-and-Execution-Plans.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/NHibernate_and_Execution_Plans</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/NHibernate_and_Execution_Plans</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 12:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Getting Started with IronPython</title>
      <description>I recently spent some time getting IronPython up and running on my system; I will review what I learned in this post.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fcharlie%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f25%2frunning-ironpython.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fcharlie%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f25%2frunning-ironpython.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Getting_Started_with_IronPython_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Getting_Started_with_IronPython_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 05:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Exclusive Interview With Steve Ballmer: Products, Competition, The Roa</title>
      <description>Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer visited Silicon Valley on Thursday for his annual meeting with top venture capitalists to talk about Microsoft product strategy. This was his first visit to Silicon Valley since announcing the search partnership with Yahoo in July. I had a chance to sit down with him just after that event for a hour-long one-one-one interview. In the first 10+ minutes of the interview Ballmer gives his high level thoughts on major Microsoft products and strategies (including Windows, Windows Mobile, Internet Explorer, Bing, Azure, Mesh, Natal and others), competition, the future of search and search marketing, Microsoft's "three screens and the cloud" strategy, the recent acquisition of Interactive Supercomputing and, yes, even his thoughts on Twitter.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.techcrunch.com%2f2009%2f09%2f24%2fmicrosoft-ballmer-interview-exclusive-techcrunch-bing-mobile-azur%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.techcrunch.com%2f2009%2f09%2f24%2fmicrosoft-ballmer-interview-exclusive-techcrunch-bing-mobile-azur%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/products/Exclusive_Interview_With_Steve_Ballmer_Products_Competition_The_Roa</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/products/Exclusive_Interview_With_Steve_Ballmer_Products_Competition_The_Roa</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fun With Method Missing and C# 4.0</title>
      <description>Ruby has a neat feature that allows you to hook into method calls for which the method is not defined. In such cases, Ruby will call a method on your class named method_missing. I showed an example of this using IronRuby a while back when I wrote about monkey patching CLR objects.
Typically, this sort of wild chicanery is safely contained within the world of those wild and crazy dynamic language aficionados, far away from the peaceful waters of those who prefer statically typed languages.
Until now suckas! (cue heart pounding rock music with a fast beat) &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f08%2f26%2fmethod-missing-csharp-4.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f08%2f26%2fmethod-missing-csharp-4.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Fun_With_Method_Missing_and_C_4_0</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Fun_With_Method_Missing_and_C_4_0</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pay Attention to the Foreach Implicit Casting </title>
      <description>In order to reduce an explicit conversion effort using the foreach statement, the C# developers decided to do an automatic conversion for us. We must pay attention to it... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2009%2f07%2f28%2fpay-attention-to-the-foreach-implicit-casting%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dev102.com%2f2009%2f07%2f28%2fpay-attention-to-the-foreach-implicit-casting%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Pay_Attention_to_the_Foreach_Implicit_Casting</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Pay_Attention_to_the_Foreach_Implicit_Casting</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 16:15:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Law of Demeter Is Not A Dot Counting Exercise</title>
      <description>As a discussion of a code expression with more than one dot grows longer, the probability that someone claims a Law of Demeter violation approaches 1 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f07%2f14%2flaw-of-demeter-dot-counting.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhaacked.com%2farchive%2f2009%2f07%2f14%2flaw-of-demeter-dot-counting.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/The_Law_of_Demeter_Is_Not_A_Dot_Counting_Exercise</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/The_Law_of_Demeter_Is_Not_A_Dot_Counting_Exercise</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 08:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Delayed execution vs ToList() in LINQ Database Queries</title>
      <description>Should you use ToList() in your repository methods, or should you pass the iterator back to the UI to delay the execution of the query? Read on to find out why it's a bad idea to delay execution in this case. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f06%2fdelayed-execution-vs-tolist-in-linq-database-queries.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.ytechie.com%2f2009%2f06%2fdelayed-execution-vs-tolist-in-linq-database-queries.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Delayed_execution_vs_ToList_in_LINQ_Database_Queries</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/Delayed_execution_vs_ToList_in_LINQ_Database_Queries</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 14:00:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Asp.Net vs php : Speed Comparison</title>
      <description>Why is the myth that php is faster than Asp.Net so prevalent?  Asp.Net is faster than php, here are the facts. So many times I have heard php pushers claim that php is so much faster than Asp.Net and that Asp.Net is clunky and slow. The most annoying part is that everything I have read (that is not factless opinion), and I mean everything, says that this is wrong; but for some reason, this myth is widely accepted. It has become a religious argument that ignores the facts... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fAspNet-vs-php--speed-comparison.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fnaspinski.net%2fpost%2fAspNet-vs-php--speed-comparison.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Asp_Net_vs_php_Speed_Comparison</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Asp_Net_vs_php_Speed_Comparison</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning Doesn't Work if You Don't Do It Right...</title>
      <description>If you're going to spend time reading and searching, make sure you know what works best for your brain. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fSanjayU%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f11%2flearning-doesnrsquot-work-if-you-donrsquot-do-it-righthellip.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fgeekswithblogs.net%2fSanjayU%2farchive%2f2009%2f06%2f11%2flearning-doesnrsquot-work-if-you-donrsquot-do-it-righthellip.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Learning_Doesn_t_Work_if_You_Don_t_Do_It_Right</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Learning_Doesn_t_Work_if_You_Don_t_Do_It_Right</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 11:56:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning new Programmming Languages and Technologies</title>
      <description>Recently, I've read article after article about how part of being a good software developer is about being open to new technologies, and to "learn new things" - and I'd be foolish not to agree. However... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How to test your multi-threaded code (part 1 of 3)?</title>
      <description>CHESS is the answer. At least this is what we have best right now. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decarufel.net%2f2009%2f05%2fhow-to-test-your-multi-threaded-code.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.decarufel.net%2f2009%2f05%2fhow-to-test-your-multi-threaded-code.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/How_to_test_your_multi_threaded_code_part_1_of_3</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/How_to_test_your_multi_threaded_code_part_1_of_3</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 23:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Building a Progressive Fluent Interface</title>
      <description>Taking a look at how to build a Progressive Fluent Interface which is a DSL where the options can and will change as you progress through the syntax. This is a useful form of a fluent interface if the want to be able to skillfully guide the user down only one path at a time. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f95"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dimecasts.net%2fCasts%2fCastDetails%2f95" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Building_a_Progressive_Fluent_Interface</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Building_a_Progressive_Fluent_Interface</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:31:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Construct a comma delimited list from table column with SQL</title>
      <description>How many times have you had to create a comma delimited list from a table column? Do you ever remember how to do it? I don't. Here is a little snippet I find useful &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fConstruct-a-comma-delimited-list-from-table-column-with-SQL.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fConstruct-a-comma-delimited-list-from-table-column-with-SQL.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Construct_a_comma_delimited_list_from_table_column_with_SQL</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/Construct_a_comma_delimited_list_from_table_column_with_SQL</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:16:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>YourTopJob.com - Find IT jobs across the UK</title>
      <description>Job site, with IT jobs, across the UK &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.yourtopjob.com%2fSector.aspx%3fname%3dIT%2b%2526%2bTelecoms%26sector%3d52"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.yourtopjob.com%2fSector.aspx%3fname%3dIT%2b%2526%2bTelecoms%26sector%3d52" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/YourTopJob_com_Find_IT_jobs_across_the_UK</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/YourTopJob_com_Find_IT_jobs_across_the_UK</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 18:38:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>RegEx Multiple Matches with Lookahead Assertion</title>
      <description>This is a quick article where I would like to show how to use regular expression to get all matches of a particular pattern from the string.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fRegEx-Multiple-Matches-with-Lookahead-Assertion.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fRegEx-Multiple-Matches-with-Lookahead-Assertion.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/RegEx_Multiple_Matches_with_Lookahead_Assertion</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/RegEx_Multiple_Matches_with_Lookahead_Assertion</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:16:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SQL Find last week date range</title>
      <description>The other day we needed to write a report on online sales for the last week. SQL doesn't offer developers many predefined functions to work with date ranges unlike the C# programming language. Here is a little example how to query SQL for some data between the dates for the last week. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSQL-Find-last-week-date-range.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSQL-Find-last-week-date-range.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Find_last_week_date_range</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SQL_Find_last_week_date_range</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Nov 2008 16:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Anders Hejlsberg: The future of programming languages</title>
      <description>In this video Anders Hejlsberg takes a look at the future of programming languages and sees the trends; declarative, dynamic and concurrent. As the chief designer of the C# programming language and a key participant in the development of the .NET Framework Anders Hejlsberg has a lot to say about this development - not just as a wish but also as something that can be realized. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jaoo.dk%2f2008%2f10%2f07%2fthe-future-of-programming-languages%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jaoo.dk%2f2008%2f10%2f07%2fthe-future-of-programming-languages%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Anders_Hejlsberg_The_future_of_programming_languages</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Anders_Hejlsberg_The_future_of_programming_languages</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 03:31:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ListBox Extension Method for Get and Set Selected Values</title>
      <description>ASP.Net ListBox control allows two types of selection mode: single and multiple. Working in single selection mode is similar to working with DropDown list control. Use ListBox.SelectedValue to get the value that was selected by a user. In order to set a selection SelectedIndex property can be used or Selected property of a particular item should be set to true.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fListBox-Extension-Method-for-Get-and-Set-Selected-Values.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fListBox-Extension-Method-for-Get-and-Set-Selected-Values.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/ListBox_Extension_Method_for_Get_and_Set_Selected_Values</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/ListBox_Extension_Method_for_Get_and_Set_Selected_Values</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 16:28:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>BlogEngine Flaws</title>
      <description>Recently I've been having problems as the site has gotten more popular I've had comments and even posts disappearing randomly, sometimes re-appearing you might have experienced this yourself either on my site or in your own so after divulging into the code to see what was happening found something I thought was shocking. When you add a comment, or Rating, Approving and Remove Comments this is what BlogEngine DbBlogProvider actually does... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngine-Flaws.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fBlogEngine-Flaws.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_Flaws</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/BlogEngine_Flaws</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:01:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Web developers. You suck.</title>
      <description>Well, JavaScript developers, specifically. In order to aid in development of my own websites, I enabled JavaScript debugging in Internet Explorer a few weeks back. To my horror, I have quickly experienced what seems to be complete disregard for serving syntactically correct JavaScript on the open internet. No, I'm not just talking about a few niche websites, run by amateur programmers. I am talking about industry-leading nerd-friendly powerhouse websites that should know better. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fWeb-developers-You-suck.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fWeb-developers-You-suck.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Web_developers_You_suck</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ajax/Web_developers_You_suck</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:46:05 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Get Checked Repeater Items Extension Method</title>
      <description>Imagine you have a list of some items and checkboxes next to each item providing the ability for a user to make multiple choices and submit a result in one go. Weather you are implementing a news groups subscription, user survey or online products catalogue - the code behind is the same: we bind some object list to a data control like Repeater, add a checkbox to every item, set checkbox value to item ID.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fGet-Checked-Repeater-Items-Extension-Method.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fGet-Checked-Repeater-Items-Extension-Method.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Get_Checked_Repeater_Items_Extension_Method</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Get_Checked_Repeater_Items_Extension_Method</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 14:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>enum to friendly string extension method</title>
      <description>We use enums quite extensively in our application as they are a great for representing integral values in a strongly typed way using symbolic names. The enum names are not very friendly to the user and I recently read a some good articles which tried to solve this problem. However, I think i've found a better solution to this problem using extension methods. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fenum-to-friendly-string-extension-method.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fenum-to-friendly-string-extension-method.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/enum_to_friendly_string_extension_method</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/enum_to_friendly_string_extension_method</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 23:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>SCOPE_IDENTITY() return the id from the database on insert</title>
      <description>As a .NET programmer most of my time is spent coding in C# and I try to avoid writing SQL where possible. Recently I had to write an insert stored procedure and needed to return the ID of the row I was inserting. While writing my usual bad SQL I came across a fascinating function I've never used before, SCOPE_IDENTITY(). &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSCOPE_IDENTITY()-return-the-id-from-the-database-on-insert.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fSCOPE_IDENTITY()-return-the-id-from-the-database-on-insert.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_return_the_id_from_the_database_on_insert</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/database/SCOPE_IDENTITY_return_the_id_from_the_database_on_insert</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 May 2008 22:16:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
