<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by FlukeFan</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by FlukeFan</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Fluent NHibernate Solution to enable SchemaExport to create HiLo colum</title>
      <description>I spent a few hours recently trying to figure out why Fluent NHibernate (FNH) wasn't doing what I thought it should be doing when using the HiLo generator conventions and then using the SchemaExport tool to generate my schema. After eventually looking at the hbm files that FNH was producing for a possible error and to make sure that I was using FNH correctly, I realised that FNH wasn't the problem, and that the problem lies within SchemaExport.

I have created a solution ... for FNH shown below. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fanthonydewhirst.blogspot.com%2f2012%2f02%2ffluent-nhibernate-solution-to-enable.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fanthonydewhirst.blogspot.com%2f2012%2f02%2ffluent-nhibernate-solution-to-enable.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Fluent_NHibernate_Solution_to_enable_SchemaExport_to_create_HiLo_colum</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Fluent_NHibernate_Solution_to_enable_SchemaExport_to_create_HiLo_colum</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:40:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IQueryable Can Kill Your Dog, Steal Your Wife, Kill Your Will To Live,</title>
      <description>If you take a quick detour over to StackOverflow, you'll realize very, very quickly that, when it comes to wholly and full-heartedly screwing up your Linq to SQL statements, the screw-up almost always involves a misunderstanding of the purpose and... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.weirdlover.com%2f2010%2f05%2f11%2fiqueryable-can-kill-your-dog-steal-your-wife-kill-your-will-to-live-etc%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.weirdlover.com%2f2010%2f05%2f11%2fiqueryable-can-kill-your-dog-steal-your-wife-kill-your-will-to-live-etc%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/IQueryable_Can_Kill_Your_Dog_Steal_Your_Wife_Kill_Your_Will_To_Live</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/IQueryable_Can_Kill_Your_Dog_Steal_Your_Wife_Kill_Your_Will_To_Live</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 19:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Tests are not Second-Class Citizens</title>
      <description>Describing some of the mistakes that can be made when attempting Continuous Integration. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f03%2ftests-are-not-second-class-citizens.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f03%2ftests-are-not-second-class-citizens.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Tests_are_not_Second_Class_Citizens</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Tests_are_not_Second_Class_Citizens</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 06:05:50 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Cartoon. Tetris development</title>
      <description>Next comic strip about programmers' fail. Guess what's wrong before reading the notes? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhacktoons.com%2f2010%2f02%2ftetris-development%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhacktoons.com%2f2010%2f02%2ftetris-development%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Cartoon_Tetris_development</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/tipsandtricks/Cartoon_Tetris_development</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 15:45:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rounded Corners with the Cornerz jQuery plugin</title>
      <description>I found a useful plugin to create rounded corners with ease. The output looked consistent in most of the latest browsers I tested it on. Here's a post introducing you to the plugin &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.devcurry.com%2f2010%2f02%2frounded-corners-with-cornerz-jquery.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.devcurry.com%2f2010%2f02%2frounded-corners-with-cornerz-jquery.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Rounded_Corners_with_the_Cornerz_jQuery_plugin</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Rounded_Corners_with_the_Cornerz_jQuery_plugin</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2010 15:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Composition versus Inheritance</title>
      <description>Discusses the benefit of Composition versus Inheritance. Touches on IoC Containers and how they can help you achieve more granular bits of code that make your applications more flexible and easier to maintain. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2010%2f02%2f12%2fcomposition-versus-inheritance.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fchad_myers%2farchive%2f2010%2f02%2f12%2fcomposition-versus-inheritance.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Composition_versus_Inheritance</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Composition_versus_Inheritance</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 12:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Context and Best Practices</title>
      <description>The Right Way versus the Better Way; Default Architectures; Starting Small &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2010%2f01%2f26%2fcontext-and-best-practices.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.lostechies.com%2fblogs%2fjimmy_bogard%2farchive%2f2010%2f01%2f26%2fcontext-and-best-practices.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Context_and_Best_Practices</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Context_and_Best_Practices</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 17:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IE8 And Web Standards</title>
      <description>Earlier this year,  Microsoft submitted 7200 CSS 2.1 test cases to the W3C, as a mature approach to move the web forward and help solving ambiguities, options and misinterpretations in any specification. 
In this post you will get a sense of how these tests work and how IE, Firefox, Safari, Opera and Chrome are passing these tests. 
You will also find a demo of Expression Web SuperPreview and some very positive feedback from the Mozilla team.
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2finnov8showcase%2farchive%2f2009%2f12%2f14%2fie8-and-web-standards.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2finnov8showcase%2farchive%2f2009%2f12%2f14%2fie8-and-web-standards.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/IE8_And_Web_Standards</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/ie/IE8_And_Web_Standards</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 21:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use Google's Closure Compiler in C#</title>
      <description>A very simple and small C# class for utilizing the Google Closure Compiler API for minifying JavaScript. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fUse-Googles-Closure-Compiler-in-C.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmadskristensen.net%2fpost%2fUse-Googles-Closure-Compiler-in-C.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Use_Google_s_Closure_Compiler_in_C</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Use_Google_s_Closure_Compiler_in_C</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>hornget - apt-get for .Net OSS</title>
      <description>Hornget provides an apt-get like service for common .Net Open Source projects.  Want the latest NHibernate, Castle ActiveRecord, Rhino Commons but don't want to go through the headache of the numerous build processes and dependencies?  Hornget supplies a daily a build of a number of OSS projects trunks as a downloadable Zip to ease upgrading to the latest versions &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fhornget.net%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fhornget.net%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/hornget_apt_get_for_Net_OSS</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/hornget_apt_get_for_Net_OSS</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 15:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Selective Unit Testing - Costs and Benefits</title>
      <description>Test Driven Development is widely regarded as a hallmark technique of professional software development, but should you really do it all the time? Steve Sanderson argues that unit tests yield significant practical business value only for certain kinds of code. This blog post suggests what might be the underlying forces that determine whether unit tests will justify the long-term expense of creating and maintaining them. These ideas are then applied to structuring an ASP.NET MVC application. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.codeville.net%2f2009%2f11%2f04%2fselective-unit-testing-costs-and-benefits%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.codeville.net%2f2009%2f11%2f04%2fselective-unit-testing-costs-and-benefits%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Selective_Unit_Testing_Costs_and_Benefits</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Selective_Unit_Testing_Costs_and_Benefits</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 16:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Is Silverlight the new WebForms?</title>
      <description>Is Silverlight becoming the same crutch that WebForms was nearly a decade ago? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f09%2f14%2fis-silverlight-the-new-webforms%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f09%2f14%2fis-silverlight-the-new-webforms%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Is_Silverlight_the_new_WebForms</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Is_Silverlight_the_new_WebForms</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Enterprise Product: $50,000 and 8 months - You must be kidding!</title>
      <description>Nick Beaugeard (Founde , HubOne) describes how the built a Certified, Enterprise ready application in 8 months and with a budget of only $50,000. The solution is written purely in .Net and thanks to the Microsoft Bizspark program, they took advantage of Visual Sudio Team System 2008 to help manage the process. This is a description of development process rather than necessarily the technologies applied, but should be of interest to anyone writing commercial software. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftheagileexecutive.com%2f2009%2f08%2f11%2fenterprise-product-50000-and-8-months-you-must-be-kidding%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftheagileexecutive.com%2f2009%2f08%2f11%2fenterprise-product-50000-and-8-months-you-must-be-kidding%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/teamsystem/Enterprise_Product_50_000_and_8_months_You_must_be_kidding</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/teamsystem/Enterprise_Product_50_000_and_8_months_You_must_be_kidding</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Toughest Developer Puzzle Ever</title>
      <description>What happens when you get a few web developers who like puzzles together?  Check out Jeff Blankenburg's post on the Toughest Developer Puzzle Ever, and rise to the challenge! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffblankenburg.com%2f2009%2f06%2flooking-for-mental-challenge-here-it-is.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjeffblankenburg.com%2f2009%2f06%2flooking-for-mental-challenge-here-it-is.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/events/The_Toughest_Developer_Puzzle_Ever</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/events/The_Toughest_Developer_Puzzle_Ever</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Pulling others up</title>
      <description>What should you do when you're in a situation where the people you're working with aren't using the latest and greatest technology and might not be using the so-called &amp;quot;best practices&amp;quot; that you subscribe to? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f30%2fpulling-others-up%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f30%2fpulling-others-up%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Pulling_others_up</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Pulling_others_up</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Throw Exceptions In Your Domain</title>
      <description>If you have a Domain Model, you're going to have code that validates rules and checks for inconsistencies ... start with the simplest way of handling business logic errors: throw an exception.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2fthrow-exceptions-in-your-domain.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fbroloco.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f06%2fthrow-exceptions-in-your-domain.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Throw_Exceptions_In_Your_Domain</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Throw_Exceptions_In_Your_Domain</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2009 15:36:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Learning new Programmming Languages and Technologies</title>
      <description>Recently, I've read article after article about how part of being a good software developer is about being open to new technologies, and to "learn new things" - and I'd be foolish not to agree. However... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.objectreference.net%2fpost%2fLearning-new-Programmming-Languages-and-Technologies.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Learning_new_Programmming_Languages_and_Technologies</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 08:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Should We Return Null From Our Methods?</title>
      <description>I read a interesting article recently about the potential perils of Null Check Hell. The author's suggestion? Stop allowing any of your methods to return nulls, ever . No nulls returned, no null checks necessary. Problem solved, right? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2fshould-we-return-null-from-our-methods%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2fshould-we-return-null-from-our-methods%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Should_We_Return_Null_From_Our_Methods</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Should_We_Return_Null_From_Our_Methods</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 16:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>My Dot Net Developer's tools list, and more.</title>
      <description>I gave a brownbag presentation at my current client recently about the common tools (in addition to Visual Studio), that I use on a regular basis for working with .NET or web development in general. I also threw in some non-development tools that are a part of my day to day life and make things easier. Here's the complete list: &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.DotNetSurfers.com%2fBlog%2f2009%2f05%2f23%2fMyDotNetDeveloperrsquosToolsListAndMorehellip.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.DotNetSurfers.com%2fBlog%2f2009%2f05%2f23%2fMyDotNetDeveloperrsquosToolsListAndMorehellip.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/My_Dot_Net_Developer_s_tools_list_and_more</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/My_Dot_Net_Developer_s_tools_list_and_more</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 02:00:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Free T4 Editor for your ASP.NET MVC T4 Templates available</title>
      <description>Found on tangible blog, that the new tangible T4 Editor 1.4 FREE EDITION now includes full Intelli-Sense support

for MVC Host and related namespaces used in ASP.NET MVC 1.0 RTM T4 Templates. In addition it provides a nice highlighting
for ASP.NET and T4 Code.

Seems like anyone can now edit MVC T4 Templates with full comfort without investing a penny. 

Awesome! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2ftangibleengineering.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2ftangible-t4-editor-14-support-for-mvc.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2ftangibleengineering.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f05%2ftangible-t4-editor-14-support-for-mvc.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Free_T4_Editor_for_your_ASP_NET_MVC_T4_Templates_available</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/Free_T4_Editor_for_your_ASP_NET_MVC_T4_Templates_available</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 23:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Regex Hero to the Rescue</title>
      <description>From BucketSoft comes an online Silverlight regular expression tool utilizing the .NET regular expression engine. Features instantaneous highlighting of regular expression matches. It's a great way to test iterations of your .NET regular expressions quickly. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.regexhero.com%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.regexhero.com%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/Regex_Hero_to_the_Rescue</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/Regex_Hero_to_the_Rescue</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 04:16:14 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Top 10 .NET Twitterers</title>
      <description>If your not on Twitter you are missing out - here are some .NET tweeps to get you started. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.dzone.com%2farticles%2ftop-10-net-twitterers"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdotnet.dzone.com%2farticles%2ftop-10-net-twitterers" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Top_10_NET_Twitterers</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Top_10_NET_Twitterers</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2009 11:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Singletons vs. Static Classes</title>
      <description>My last &amp;quot;versus&amp;quot; post seemed to elicit a good number of interesting responses. Today, I'm musing about Singletons vs. Static Classes -- two constructs which appear to accomplish the same task. Or do they? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2fsingletons-vs-static-classes%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fleedumond.com%2fblog%2fsingletons-vs-static-classes%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Singletons_vs_Static_Classes</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Singletons_vs_Static_Classes</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 08:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just say No! to C# Regions</title>
      <description>You need a language construct so that your IDE can help you hide your big messy code block from you (because it's just so hideous, you don't even want to look at it anymore)? &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fextractmethod.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f29%2fjust-say-no-to-c-regions%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fextractmethod.wordpress.com%2f2008%2f02%2f29%2fjust-say-no-to-c-regions%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Just_say_No_to_C_Regions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Just_say_No_to_C_Regions</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 08:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ten C# Keywords That You Shouldn't Be Using</title>
      <description>Overview of some not-so-common keywords and reasons to avoid them...or understand what the implications are if we use them. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codethinked.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f02%2fTen-C-Keywords-That-You-Shouldne28099t-Be-Using.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ten_C_Keywords_That_You_Shouldn_t_Be_Using</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 18:31:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
