<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by MrBaldman</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by MrBaldman</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Regex Hero can now translate a regular expression into English</title>
      <description>Regular expressions are one of those things that many programmers dabble with enough to understand the concept, but not enough to memorize the syntax. Code completion is a big step towards making things easier. Beyond that, sometimes an explanation written out in English is just what you need. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.regexhero.net%2f2010%2f12%2fto-demand-explanation.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.regexhero.net%2f2010%2f12%2fto-demand-explanation.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/Regex_Hero_can_now_translate_a_regular_expression_into_English</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/regex/Regex_Hero_can_now_translate_a_regular_expression_into_English</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Dec 2010 06:40:11 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>How To: Change Instance Name Of SQL Server</title>
      <description>Quick easy tip to change the server name of your SQL instance. I found this really useful for my DEV box
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcoderjournal.com%2f2008%2f02%2fhow-to-change-instance-name-of-sql-server%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcoderjournal.com%2f2008%2f02%2fhow-to-change-instance-name-of-sql-server%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/How_To_Change_Instance_Name_Of_SQL_Server_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/How_To_Change_Instance_Name_Of_SQL_Server_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Oct 2010 13:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>.NET Formatting Reference Sheet</title>
      <description>Various native .NET framework types include an overloaded version of the ToString method that accepts a format string. This reference sheet provides a list of standard formats and custom format specifiers for numeric types, DateTimes, GUIDs and enums. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blackwasp.co.uk%2fDotNetFormatting.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blackwasp.co.uk%2fDotNetFormatting.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/NET_Formatting_Reference_Sheet</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/NET_Formatting_Reference_Sheet</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 14 Oct 2010 16:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Book Review: Microsoft Entity Framework in Action</title>
      <description>I highly recommend this book. No further knowledge about Entity Framework is required. So you don't have to know anything about EF1 in order to read and gain benefit of this book. Great effort spent on this book by the authors and the publisher. You'll get a great value with reasonable amount of money compared to the information provided in this book. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmosesofegypt.net%2fpost%2fBook-Review-Microsoft-Entity-Framework-in-Action.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmosesofegypt.net%2fpost%2fBook-Review-Microsoft-Entity-Framework-in-Action.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Book_Review_Microsoft_Entity_Framework_in_Action</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Book_Review_Microsoft_Entity_Framework_in_Action</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 22:20:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Order in Chaos: .NET Collections - Arik Poznanski's Blog</title>
      <description>Order in Chaos: .NET Collections This is a review of the current available collection types in .NET Framework 4.0 Note that I don't plan to explain all the history of the different collection. If a class is obsolete, that is enough information. The intention is to use this post as a reference when you need to decide which type of collection you should use. Also, I'm not going to give the complexity of each function. You can find such information in the relevant class documentation on MSDN. Anywa... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2farik%2farchive%2f2010%2f10%2f08%2forder-in-chaos-net-collections.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.microsoft.co.il%2fblogs%2farik%2farchive%2f2010%2f10%2f08%2forder-in-chaos-net-collections.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Order_in_Chaos_NET_Collections_Arik_Poznanski_s_Blog</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Order_in_Chaos_NET_Collections_Arik_Poznanski_s_Blog</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 14:15:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Introduction Tips to Workflow 4.0</title>
      <description>Introduction Tips and materials to Microsoft Workflow Foundation 4.0 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcecildt.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f10%2fintroduction-tips-to-workflow-40.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcecildt.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f10%2fintroduction-tips-to-workflow-40.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wwf/Introduction_Tips_to_Workflow_4_0</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wwf/Introduction_Tips_to_Workflow_4_0</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Oct 2010 15:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Entity Framework CTP 4.0 - Code First Approach</title>
      <description>It has been a month or two  that Entity Framework CTP 4.0 bits have released.I had read through the feature list back then but could not manage time to take a detailed look until this weekend.I always felt that Entity Framework's approach towards handling of configuration(object relational mappings) and plain .NET objects was bit restrictive and cumbersome respectively.The mappings are needed to be stored in Entity Data Model(.edmx) files which are nothing but xml files with object to relational store mapping information.There was no proper way to express this mapping through code or attributes.But with code first approach we will able to describe our model using plain .NET objects and map it to the database objects through .NET code.In this post we will discuss the very basic steps involved in doing so. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fsankarsan.wordpress.com%2f2010%2f10%2f03%2fentity-framework-ctp-4-0-code-first-approach%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fsankarsan.wordpress.com%2f2010%2f10%2f03%2fentity-framework-ctp-4-0-code-first-approach%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Entity_Framework_CTP_4_0_Code_First_Approach</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/adonet/Entity_Framework_CTP_4_0_Code_First_Approach</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 20:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Looking at Git and GitHub</title>
      <description>Recently I decided to take a look at Git and start checking what are the things that makes it different from other version control systems ... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmariangemarcano.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f09%2flooking-at-git-and-github.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmariangemarcano.blogspot.com%2f2010%2f09%2flooking-at-git-and-github.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Looking_at_Git_and_GitHub</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Looking_at_Git_and_GitHub</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 03 Oct 2010 15:00:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Writing AJAX web applications in Asp.Net MVC</title>
      <description>Using ajax web services, call them in javascript and display the html through a template in Asp.net MVC.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2flukencode.com%2f2010%2f09%2f26%2fwriting-ajax-web-applications-in-asp-net-mvc%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2flukencode.com%2f2010%2f09%2f26%2fwriting-ajax-web-applications-in-asp-net-mvc%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Writing_AJAX_web_applications_in_Asp_Net_MVC</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Writing_AJAX_web_applications_in_Asp_Net_MVC</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 09:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Google Cannot Solve your Coding Problems</title>
      <description>I imagine 80/90% of programmers, myself included, are guilty of this everday form of insanity. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codersbarn.com%2fpost%2f2010%2f09%2f26%2fASPNET-Programming-Tips-Tip-1.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codersbarn.com%2fpost%2f2010%2f09%2f26%2fASPNET-Programming-Tips-Tip-1.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Google_Cannot_Solve_your_Coding_Problems</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Google_Cannot_Solve_your_Coding_Problems</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 Sep 2010 12:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Two Questions that Most ASP.NET Developers Cannot Answer</title>
      <description>After interviewing approximently 30 applicant's for mid-level to senior level ASP.NET positions, nearly all cannot answer the following two questions:

   1. Describe the following access modifiers:
         a. private
         b. protected
         b. internal
         d. public
   2. What is the difference between an ASP.NET Literal control and a Label control
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2frantdriven.com%2fpost%2fTwo-Questions-that-Most-ASPNET-Developers-Cannot-Answer.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2frantdriven.com%2fpost%2fTwo-Questions-that-Most-ASPNET-Developers-Cannot-Answer.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Two_Questions_that_Most_ASP_NET_Developers_Cannot_Answer_1</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Two_Questions_that_Most_ASP_NET_Developers_Cannot_Answer_1</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Sep 2010 13:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>WPF </title>
      <description>Is WPF dead? Is Silverlight dead? Will Microsoft embrace and assimilate HTML5? Rumours are all we have - but they are plausible rumours.

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.i-programmer.info%2fnews%2f89-net%2f1266-wpf-a-silverlight-at-risk-from-microsofts-passion-for-html5.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.i-programmer.info%2fnews%2f89-net%2f1266-wpf-a-silverlight-at-risk-from-microsofts-passion-for-html5.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/WPF</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/WPF</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>ASP.NET MVC Foreach Loop Sugar</title>
      <description>A simple extension method that adds additional information to the standard ForEach loop. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.paulwheeler.com%2fblog%2fasp-net-mvc-foreach-loop-sugar"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.paulwheeler.com%2fblog%2fasp-net-mvc-foreach-loop-sugar" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Foreach_Loop_Sugar</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/mvc/ASP_NET_MVC_Foreach_Loop_Sugar</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 13:15:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Build Version Increment Addin for Visual Studio</title>
      <description>Today I will introduce a tool for Visual Studio Build Version Increment Add-In Visual Studio

I want to have automatic build version increment for my apps and libraries to avoid setting it manually again and again. After 5 minutes searching on the internetnet, I found Build Version Increment add-in for Visual Studio 2005/2008. This add-in is very simple in use but do exactly what everyone developer needs.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fteam.sfi.vn%2fpost%2fBuild-Version-Increment-Add-In-Visual-Studio.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fteam.sfi.vn%2fpost%2fBuild-Version-Increment-Add-In-Visual-Studio.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Build_Version_Increment_Addin_for_Visual_Studio</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Build_Version_Increment_Addin_for_Visual_Studio</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:15:01 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Handling image uploads with Asp.Net Mvc </title>
      <description>A very common taks in web development is uploading images. This isn't realy a hard task in it self, but it can be pretty frustrating to write the same code over and over again even if its only a few lines. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattias-jakobsson.net%2fItem%2f59%2fHandling%2520image%2520uploads%2520with%2520Asp.Net%2520Mvc"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmattias-jakobsson.net%2fItem%2f59%2fHandling%2520image%2520uploads%2520with%2520Asp.Net%2520Mvc" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Handling_image_uploads_with_Asp_Net_Mvc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/patterns/Handling_image_uploads_with_Asp_Net_Mvc</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>C# Identify Crisis, You Have To Know Your Identity</title>
      <description>Marking the beginning of the end of C# as language and its ongoing identity crisis. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevcomponents.com%2fblog%2f%3fp%3d448"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fdevcomponents.com%2fblog%2f%3fp%3d448" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/C_Identify_Crisis_You_Have_To_Know_Your_Identity</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/C_Identify_Crisis_You_Have_To_Know_Your_Identity</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:45:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>LINQ to SQL is NOT dead!</title>
      <description>Ever since Microsoft announced that the Entity Framework was their ORM of choice, people everywhere have been saying, "LINQ to SQL is dead!" A lot of people feel like they're not allowed to use LINQ to SQL anymore and that they have to use Entity Framework instead.

In fact, LINQ to SQL is not only alive and well, Microsoft has even announced LINQ to SQL improvements in .NET 4.0, including finally adding using ITable&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; for tables instead of Table&amp;lt;T&amp;gt;, which makes it much easier to test. Combine that with this open source tool that will create an IDataContext interface for you and you're on your way to testable LINQ to SQL. So no, LINQ to SQL is not dead!! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f06%2flinq-to-sql-is-not-dead%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fjonkruger.com%2fblog%2f2009%2f06%2f06%2flinq-to-sql-is-not-dead%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_is_NOT_dead</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/linq/LINQ_to_SQL_is_NOT_dead</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:00:03 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automatically minify and combine JavaScript in Visual Studio</title>
      <description>As you begin developing more complex client-side functionality, managing the size and shape of your JavaScript includes becomes a key concern. It's all too easy to accidentally end up with hundreds of kilobytes of JavaScript spread across many separate HTTP requests, significantly slowing down your initial page loads.

I hope you'll find that this technique is a good compromise between the tedium of using manual minification tools and the overwrought complexity of setting up some of the more "enterprisey" automation solutions. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fautomatically-minify-and-combine-javascript-in-visual-studio%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fencosia.com%2f2009%2f05%2f20%2fautomatically-minify-and-combine-javascript-in-visual-studio%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Automatically_minify_and_combine_JavaScript_in_Visual_Studio</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/visualstudio/Automatically_minify_and_combine_JavaScript_in_Visual_Studio</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 03:06:38 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Smooth Cascading Effect with ASP.NET Panels using jQuery </title>
      <description>jQUery at its best -- Smooth cascading effect with the ASP.NET Panels and jQuery  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d313"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.dotnetcurry.com%2fShowArticle.aspx%3fID%3d313" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Smooth_Cascading_Effect_with_ASP_NET_Panels_using_jQuery</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/jquery/Smooth_Cascading_Effect_with_ASP_NET_Panels_using_jQuery</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 20:01:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Lazy Loading jQuery Tabs with ASP.NET</title>
      <description>This article looks at efficient use of jQuery tabs when displaying data. Specifically, it covers how to lazy-load data, so that it is only accessed and displayed if the tab is clicked. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d102"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.mikesdotnetting.com%2fArticle.aspx%3fArticleID%3d102" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Lazy_Loading_jQuery_Tabs_with_ASP_NET</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Lazy_Loading_jQuery_Tabs_with_ASP_NET</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 02:46:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Crazy Wheels - Funny BlogEngine.NET theme</title>
      <description>Crazy Wheels is another free BlogEngine.NET theme by jankoatwarpspeed.com. It is a simple, colorful, three column theme. Is has been published under Creative Commons License which means that you can use it for personal and commercial use as long as you keep the credits. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.jankoatwarpspeed.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fCrazy-Wheels-Funny-BlogEngineNET-theme.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.jankoatwarpspeed.com%2fpost%2f2009%2f04%2f01%2fCrazy-Wheels-Funny-BlogEngineNET-theme.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Crazy_Wheels_Funny_BlogEngine_NET_theme</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Crazy_Wheels_Funny_BlogEngine_NET_theme</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 07:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Optimize ASP.NET Membership Stored Procedures for greater speed and sc</title>
      <description>ASP.NET Membership stored proc are not fine tuned for high load. So, under heavy load - the major tables like aspnet_Users and aspnet_Membership produces lock contention and transaction deadlocks. Learn how to solve this. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fomar%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f14%2foptimize-asp-net-membership-stored-procedures-for-greater-speed-and-scalability.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fomar%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f14%2foptimize-asp-net-membership-stored-procedures-for-greater-speed-and-scalability.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Optimize_ASP_NET_Membership_Stored_Procedures_for_greater_speed_and_sc</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/Optimize_ASP_NET_Membership_Stored_Procedures_for_greater_speed_and_sc</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The Bare Minimum </title>
      <description>When it comes to project management, I tend to favor the less-is-more approach... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f11%2fthe-bare-minimum.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fkarlseguin%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f11%2fthe-bare-minimum.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/The_Bare_Minimum</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/The_Bare_Minimum</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2009 19:16:32 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Developing with Source Code Control Best Practices Part 2</title>
      <description>Peter continues his series on Source Code Control best practices. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fpeterritchie%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f11%2fdeveloping-with-source-code-control-best-practices-part-2.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fmsmvps.com%2fblogs%2fpeterritchie%2farchive%2f2009%2f03%2f11%2fdeveloping-with-source-code-control-best-practices-part-2.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Developing_with_Source_Code_Control_Best_Practices_Part_2</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Developing_with_Source_Code_Control_Best_Practices_Part_2</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 11:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>6 SEO Tips For ASP.NET URL's</title>
      <description>If you are building a new ASP.NET application, SEO has become a big factor in how you plan the structure / code of the site.  But quite an important part of the site which are often overlooked are the URL's, and a lot of people do the basics which I'll show below but there are a few common things people tend to miss or never thought could be a problem... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blogfodder.co.uk%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f6-SEO-Tips-For-ASPNET-URLrsquo3bs.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.blogfodder.co.uk%2fpost%2f2009%2f03%2f6-SEO-Tips-For-ASPNET-URLrsquo3bs.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/6_SEO_Tips_For_ASP_NET_URL_s</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/aspnet/6_SEO_Tips_For_ASP_NET_URL_s</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:31:55 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
