ReadOnly TextBox ASP.NET Control
posted by eggs(0) 4 years, 11 months ago 0
When I first read the title in my rss reader, I questioned why anyone would to that (other than torture unsuspecting users), then I read the body. This is pretty cool.
Reply
DevLink 2007: A world-class conference you can afford
posted by eggs(0) 4 years, 10 months ago 0
I went last year (when it was free) and learned a lot. I've already registered and recommend it to everyone.
ASP.NET Repeater control instead of grid
"For example, I have developed professional ASP.NET solutions almost every day for at least 5 years and still havn't delivered a single one (well maybe one or two in the beginning) using the datagrid/gridview." "while using a repeater instead of a datagrid also will give us the flexibility to use whatever HTML markup we want (maybe tableless using divs)" Tables are fine when they are displaying tabular data, which incidentally is what DataGrid/GridView are for as well. People here "tables are bad" and apply that to everything. Tables for layout are bad.
What is the real story behind the name of C#?
posted by eggs(0) 4 years, 7 months ago 0
yeah thats annoying
Developer Notes For the ASP.NET MVC Framework
This looks promising!
Ajax Data Controls Live examples
posted by eggs(0) 4 years, 6 months ago 0
http://dotnetslackers.com/projects/AjaxDataControls/ After like 3 levels of blogs that said: "So-and-so posted about this" then linking to another post just like it.
Copying and pasting rectangular blocks of code in Visual Studio and Ma
I've wanted this more than once and now I have it :)
Building a File Path with Path.Combine (.NET)
I would think an article about Path would include the use of Path.DirectorySeparatorChar
Try/Catch Blocks Can Hurt Performance Significantly
posted by eggs(0) 4 years, 3 months ago 0
Schwankie is right, here is a quick test I did using the methods in the linked article: Emptry dictionary, so there is an exception thrown on each iteration: No try/catch: 0.0004162 seconds Try/catch in for loop: 58.59 seconds After I filled the dictionary so no exceptions will be thrown: No try/catch: 0.0005534 Try/catch in for loop: .0065167 This is on 10,000 (ten thousand) iterations in the for loops. When I moved up to 10,000,000 (ten million, the most I coudl get without OurOfMemory exceptions) loops I got: No try/catch: .499 Try/catch: .564