<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<rss version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DotNetKicks.com : Stories kicked by malovicn</title>
    <description>Stories kicked by malovicn</description>
    <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/</link>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Atweb Publishing Ltd.</copyright>
    <docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
    <generator>DotNetKicks.com - .NET links, community driven</generator>
    <ttl>30</ttl>
    <item>
      <title>Lighthouse - Silverlight Unit Test Runner Project released</title>
      <description>Since the initial release of Silverlight i was really annoyed by the fact that Unit Testing had very slim support.
Even later when Silverlight Unit Testing Framework was introduced by Microsoft things became little better but still it was far from good.
You could create Unit Tests, but you had to start your Visual Studio in order to run them - eventually looking at the results of tests in your favorite Web Browser... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2011%2f03%2f22%2flighthouse_silverlight_unit_test_runner_project_released%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2011%2f03%2f22%2flighthouse_silverlight_unit_test_runner_project_released%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Lighthouse_Silverlight_Unit_Test_Runner_Project_released</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Lighthouse_Silverlight_Unit_Test_Runner_Project_released</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Mar 2011 23:37:57 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Naked MVVM - simplest way of making testable WCF related code</title>
      <description>Second real world tip regarding MVVM implementation is targeted toward pragamtic approach of how to test enable code making WCF service calls on the simplest possible way. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f11%2f25%2fnaked-mvvm-simplest-way-to-do-wcf-code.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f11%2f25%2fnaked-mvvm-simplest-way-to-do-wcf-code.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Naked_MVVM_simplest_way_of_making_testable_WCF_related_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Naked_MVVM_simplest_way_of_making_testable_WCF_related_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 01:19:28 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Naked MVVM - simplest MVVM architecture</title>
      <description>Article showing the concepts behind very simple MVVM implementation. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f11%2f07%2fnaked-mvvm-simplest-possible-mvvm-approach.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f11%2f07%2fnaked-mvvm-simplest-possible-mvvm-approach.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Naked_MVVM_simplest_MVVM_architecture</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/wpf/Naked_MVVM_simplest_MVVM_architecture</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 12:00:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Combining Silverlight Navigation Framework &amp;amp; Prism to create MVVM Apps</title>
      <description>This is introductory post for a series of posts where i will try to tackle the holy grail of MVVM applications - Navigation.

To do this I will be using Prism from Microsoft's Patterns and Practices team (Silverlight version - latest drop) combined with Silverlight Navigation Framework and i will build small navigation framework on top of that... &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f10%2f15%2fcombining-silverlight-navigation-framework-and-prism-to-create-mvvm-applications-introduction%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f10%2f15%2fcombining-silverlight-navigation-framework-and-prism-to-create-mvvm-applications-introduction%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Combining_Silverlight_Navigation_Framework_Prism_to_create_MVVM_Apps</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Combining_Silverlight_Navigation_Framework_Prism_to_create_MVVM_Apps</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 17 Oct 2010 10:30:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Silverlight MergedDictionaries - styles &amp;amp; resources from Class Libs</title>
      <description>If you were developing larger Silverlight/WPF applications and trying to keep things like styles, control templates and other resources organized it can become really hard.
Prior to Silverlight 3 it was hell to be honest.
But then nice people from Microsoft introduced lovely little feature called MergedDictionaries  that allows you to combine the resources from different places in your application. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f06%2f09%2fsilverlight-mergeddictionaries-using-styles-and-resources-from-class-libraries%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f06%2f09%2fsilverlight-mergeddictionaries-using-styles-and-resources-from-class-libraries%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Silverlight_MergedDictionaries_styles_resources_from_Class_Libs</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Silverlight_MergedDictionaries_styles_resources_from_Class_Libs</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 06:00:51 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>5 reasons why Silverlight sucks in LOB (compared to WPF) </title>
      <description>This post discus what technology suits better LOB applications Silverlight or WPF and provides 5 reasons why WPF makes more sense. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f06%2f02%2f5-reasons-why-silverlight-sucks-in-lob-compared-to-wpf.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f06%2f02%2f5-reasons-why-silverlight-sucks-in-lob-compared-to-wpf.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/5_reasons_why_Silverlight_sucks_in_LOB_compared_to_WPF</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/5_reasons_why_Silverlight_sucks_in_LOB_compared_to_WPF</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 08 Jun 2010 15:45:52 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Unit Testable WCF Web Services in MVVM and Silverlight 4</title>
      <description>I figured that there has to be a better way to solve this everyday problem so while working on my personal MVVM framework (yes, everyone is building one these days) i was setting these goals regarding the Web Service calls from my MVVM applications:

   1. simplify as much as possible asynchronous invocation of Web Service methods (avoid writing boring boilerplate code for each call)
   2. get rid of the Add Service Reference approach completely if possible
   3. make the Web Services unit testable (hide them behind some interface so we can mock them in our unit tests)
   4. simplify exception handling
   5. fault tolerance (if web service client is faulted by exception it should be automatically recreated)
...
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f04%2f11%2funit-testable-wcf-web-services-in-mvvm-and-silverlight-4%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.roboblob.com%2f2010%2f04%2f11%2funit-testable-wcf-web-services-in-mvvm-and-silverlight-4%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Unit_Testable_WCF_Web_Services_in_MVVM_and_Silverlight_4</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Unit_Testable_WCF_Web_Services_in_MVVM_and_Silverlight_4</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 13:15:07 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Simple (fizzbuzz like) .NET interview question covering stack and heap</title>
      <description>Simple C# interview question which doesn't have any dependencies on math etc. and which is helping understanding how the job candidate understands stack and heap. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f01%2f07%2fasking-the-right-questions-while-interviewing-developers.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2010%2f01%2f07%2fasking-the-right-questions-while-interviewing-developers.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Simple_fizzbuzz_like_NET_interview_question_covering_stack_and_heap</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Simple_fizzbuzz_like_NET_interview_question_covering_stack_and_heap</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:02:17 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Me, myself and design patterns - VusCode - Coding dreams since 1998!</title>
      <description>This blog post summarize some of the experiences related to the value of design patterns and to the process of its exploration. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f02%2fme-myself-and-design-patterns.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f02%2fme-myself-and-design-patterns.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Me_myself_and_design_patterns_VusCode_Coding_dreams_since_1998</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Me_myself_and_design_patterns_VusCode_Coding_dreams_since_1998</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:07:31 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Design for testability - WCF proxies</title>
      <description>This blog post presents a 'duck tape' way of how to have testable Silverlight code depending on WCF calls with a non-MVVM implementation  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f01%2fdesign-for-testability-wcf-proxies.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f11%2f01%2fdesign-for-testability-wcf-proxies.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Design_for_testability_WCF_proxies</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/silverlight/Design_for_testability_WCF_proxies</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:46:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Just say no to Service Locator!</title>
      <description>This is a blog post focusing on the differences between Service Locator and Dependency Injection based code particularly focusing on benefits DI has in unit testing.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f20%2fsay-no-to-servicelocator.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f20%2fsay-no-to-servicelocator.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Just_say_no_to_Service_Locator</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Just_say_no_to_Service_Locator</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:30:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>IoC, SRP and DI best practices</title>
      <description>A blog post summing some of real world IoC experiences in 5 &amp;quot;laws&amp;quot; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f16%2finversion-of-control-single-responsibility-principle-and-nikola-s-laws-of-dependency-injection.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f10%2f16%2finversion-of-control-single-responsibility-principle-and-nikola-s-laws-of-dependency-injection.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/IoC_SRP_and_DI_best_practices</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/IoC_SRP_and_DI_best_practices</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Rhino Mocks used in testing the Prism IEventAggregator based code</title>
      <description>Blog post showing how to test (with RhinoMocks) two common cases occuring in code with Prism event aggregator. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fprism-cal-unit-testing-how-to-test-prism-cal-event-aggregator-using-rhino-mocks.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f04%2f17%2fprism-cal-unit-testing-how-to-test-prism-cal-event-aggregator-using-rhino-mocks.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Rhino_Mocks_used_in_testing_the_Prism_IEventAggregator_based_code</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/unittesting/Rhino_Mocks_used_in_testing_the_Prism_IEventAggregator_based_code</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 04:51:27 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Mix 09 Quick Video Link List</title>
      <description>Mix 09 Quick Video Link List in a format allowing easy search &amp;amp; download
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcoolthingoftheday.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f03%2fmix-09-quick-video-link-list.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcoolthingoftheday.blogspot.com%2f2009%2f03%2fmix-09-quick-video-link-list.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Mix_09_Quick_Video_Link_List</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Mix_09_Quick_Video_Link_List</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:01:20 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Ruby inspired C# Extension Methods for natural DateTime operations</title>
      <description>FluentDateTime is a open source library of Ruby inspired C# Extension Methods for easier and more natural DateTime handling and operations in .NET that allows you to write code like this:
DateTime.Now + 1.Week() + 3.Days + 14.Minutes();
3.Days().Ago();
5.Days().After(new DateTime(2000, 1, 1));
DateTime.Now.NextDay();
DateTime.Now.WeekAfter();
DateTime.Now.Midnight();
DateTime.Now.SetTime(11, 55, 0); &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeplex.com%2ffluentdatetime"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fwww.codeplex.com%2ffluentdatetime" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ruby_inspired_C_Extension_Methods_for_natural_DateTime_operations</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Ruby_inspired_C_Extension_Methods_for_natural_DateTime_operations</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 17:16:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Repository&amp;lt;T&amp;gt; good or bad?</title>
      <description>Greg took a bite on current ALT .Net hot topic: Generic repositories

 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f16%2fddd-the-generic-repository.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fcodebetter.com%2fblogs%2fgregyoung%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f16%2fddd-the-generic-repository.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Repository_T_good_or_bad</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/altnet/Repository_T_good_or_bad</guid>
      <pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:01:06 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Automatic/Convention-based mapping entities with Fluent NHibernate</title>
      <description>James Gregory has a 4-part post on the &amp;quot;auto-mapping&amp;quot; features of Fluent NHibernate. Basically, Fluent NHibernate can automatically map most of your entities based on the conventions you specify and can apply other conventions such as table names, foreign-key constraint naming, etc.  This is the first post of the 4, the others are linked as Trackbacks at the bottom.  After reading these 4, you should have a better idea of how to get started using the conventional mapping features of Fluent NHibernate. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jagregory.com%2f2009%2f01%2f10%2ffluent-nhibernate-auto-mapping-introduction%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.jagregory.com%2f2009%2f01%2f10%2ffluent-nhibernate-auto-mapping-introduction%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Automatic_Convention_based_mapping_entities_with_Fluent_NHibernate</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Automatic_Convention_based_mapping_entities_with_Fluent_NHibernate</guid>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2009 01:31:12 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fluent NHibernate - AutoPersistenceModel auto mapping</title>
      <description>An blog post presenting Fluent NHibernate AutoPersitanceModel through simple code example  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f03%2ffluent-nhibernate-nhibernate-without-configuration-files-automap-magic.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2009%2f01%2f03%2ffluent-nhibernate-nhibernate-without-configuration-files-automap-magic.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Fluent_NHibernate_AutoPersistenceModel_auto_mapping</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/Fluent_NHibernate_AutoPersistenceModel_auto_mapping</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 15:12:26 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alt.NET Podcast Episode 13: Ruby on Rails</title>
      <description>Brian Eng and Jeff Cohen from the Softies on Rails blog, and James Avery discuss the Ruby on Rails web framework and what Alt.NET can learn from it. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f13-ruby-on-rails"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2fepisodes%2f13-ruby-on-rails" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_13_Ruby_on_Rails</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/Alt_NET_Podcast_Episode_13_Ruby_on_Rails</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 03:46:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Fluent NHibernate - Working with NHibernate without configuration file</title>
      <description>
&amp;quot;I believe that the most important reason why NHibernate is not more widely adopted by general DEV population is exactly the "Java XML configuration" PIA feeling you have while working with it. 

Great news for all of us from that group: NHibernate is possible to be used WITHOUT configuration files! &amp;quot;
 &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f31%2ffluent-nhibernate-nhibernate-without-configuration-files.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.vuscode.com%2fmalovicn%2farchive%2f2008%2f08%2f31%2ffluent-nhibernate-nhibernate-without-configuration-files.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Fluent_NHibernate_Working_with_NHibernate_without_configuration_file</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Fluent_NHibernate_Working_with_NHibernate_without_configuration_file</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>NDepend: code metrics at your service</title>
      <description>If you ever wrote code for a non-trivial project chances are that from time to time you stop an think: &amp;quot;I don't know, but I have the feeling that the code is not really clean/too complex/[insert adjective here that makes you feel bad about your code]&amp;quot;. Chances are even that you did not had these thoughts - but your source code indeed was not really clean, too complex or what not. While the latter situation is certainly the worse of the two, both situation make clear that we need means to quantify the quality of our code. NDepend is an excellent tool that can be used to generate those metrics &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.andreloker.de%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f08%2fNDepend-code-metrics-at-your-service.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblog.andreloker.de%2fpost%2f2008%2f07%2f08%2fNDepend-code-metrics-at-your-service.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/NDepend_code_metrics_at_your_service</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/other/NDepend_code_metrics_at_your_service</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 00:31:08 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Microsoft cracking down on community extensions</title>
      <description>Microsoft released a tool called Microsoft Source Analyzer, or StyleCop.  It analyzes source code for standards violations.  It's a 1.0 release, so it doesn't do some things ... like have a published API for custom rules or MSBuild integration.  So the community dug in and figured out how to do these things and now MS is firing off license-violation emails.  Don't they get it?  The community wants to use the product, but it's too limited ... these extensions help make it better. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2flovethedot.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fcome-on-microsoft-isnt-this-little.html"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2flovethedot.blogspot.com%2f2008%2f07%2fcome-on-microsoft-isnt-this-little.html" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Microsoft_cracking_down_on_community_extensions</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/csharp/Microsoft_cracking_down_on_community_extensions</guid>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Jul 2008 23:01:02 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Dependency Injection is Dead! </title>
      <description>The author claims that AOP-assisted Dependency Resolution, where dependencies are resolved on-demand without plumbing code and use of factories, can supersede Dependency Injection... at least in some scenarios. A refreshing view on a topic that tends to become sanctified and therefore undiscussed in our community.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsimonince%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f30%2fdependency-injection-is-dead.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2fblogs.msdn.com%2fsimonince%2farchive%2f2008%2f06%2f30%2fdependency-injection-is-dead.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Dependency_Injection_is_Dead</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/architecture/Dependency_Injection_is_Dead</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 20:46:10 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Alt.NET Podcast Launched!</title>
      <description>The Alt.NET Podcast has a new podcast. The premier episode is a conversation with David Laribee, Jeremy D. Miller, and Chad Myers about continuously improving yourself, your code, and your team. Give it a listen! &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2f"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faltnetpodcast.com%2f" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Alt_NET_Podcast_Launched</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/community/Alt_NET_Podcast_Launched</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 14 May 2008 05:01:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>.NET runs on Linux, Mac OSX and FreeBSD ?</title>
      <description>Good news. GNU adds support for .net apps in OpenSource world. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/kick/?url=http%3a%2f%2faspnetcafe.com%2fpost%2fNET-runs-on-Linux2c-Mac-OSX-and-FreeBSD-.aspx"&gt;&lt;img src="http://www.dotnetkicks.com/Services/Images/KickItImageGenerator.ashx?url=http%3a%2f%2faspnetcafe.com%2fpost%2fNET-runs-on-Linux2c-Mac-OSX-and-FreeBSD-.aspx" border="0" alt="kick it on DotNetKicks.com" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
      <link>http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NET_runs_on_Linux_Mac_OSX_and_FreeBSD</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dotnetkicks.com/opensource/NET_runs_on_Linux_Mac_OSX_and_FreeBSD</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 19:31:04 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
